این نقد هنوز ترجمه نشده است — متن اصلی (English) را نشان میدهیم.
When you pick up a mouse and don't know what to do with it, the fault isn't yours—it's the program's. PC Paintbrush 2.82 from 1985 won't leave you in doubt about that either — it's painting for DOS, and the mouse just sort of happened to show up.
It's a straightforward drawing tool in color. You've got a brush, pencil, eraser, a bucket fill, and the ability to draw lines and rectangles. The screen is limited by whatever resolution and color depth your hardware could handle. This isn't Photoshop — it's not even close. It's a program that lets you draw a picture when you've got some spare time and a mouse plugged in through a serial port that jitters and lags so much that every stroke is a risky improvisation.
Playing — I mean drawing — is predictably clunky. When you change colors or swap tools, you're wrestling with menus. The eraser doesn't just wipe away what you want; it often erases more. The brush doesn't have different sizes the way we know them today. You draw a line that looks like it's been dragged across crumpled paper with a rubber. It's not a bug; it's a feature of an era when the computer could barely keep up with rendering what you just drew without making it look like it was trying.
PC Paintbrush had the audacity to exist at a time when computer graphics were something oracles and scientists spoke about, while everyone else huddled by the windows battling over every pixel. It wasn't the best tool even in the nineties, when better competitors already existed. But it was there, and when everything else failed you, you could tinker with it for a while at least.
Today, it's nothing you need to run. It's not a historical curiosity that'll teach you something about how graphics used to be made. It's just confirmation of what you already know — that the paintbrush was a non-computer thing for ages and ages, and its digitization took longer than anyone expected.
old